Koen, On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 8:17 PM, Koen Kooi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The OE .dev branch went through some breakage due to bitbake version > troubles, so I'd like to include a copy of bitbake into the stable > branch that is known to work with it. > > what do you think? >
Also, when checking out / using old meta data, its hard to tell the compatible bitbake version(s). Should that version be the oldest bitbake that the current metadata should work with? Thinking about it, I don't think it brings much, besides maintenance hassle. On the other hand, checking out an old revision in the future checks out a compatible bitbake along with it. As an alternative, why not just keep the minimal bitbake version in the metadata? Regards, -- Leon. _______________________________________________ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
