Koen Kooi wrote:
If we drop the bookkeeping part, getting things into the stable tree will be much easier:* send explanation and diff to angstrom-distro-devel * 2 developers sign off on it * apply diff * copy-paste explanation into NEWS or ChangelogThis makes a faster turnaround possible, since a roundtrip to .dev isn't needed anymore. And we can create tarball releases of the tree every $period where people can read the NEWS or Changelog file to see the difference and decided wether updating it worth it or not.I hope with this changes people (especially machine mentors) have more time to fix bugs. Especially rare machines like Poodle, Simpad or Tosa would benefit from this.objections, additions?
+1At some point in time, a stable and development branch will diverge. We should focus Angstrom stable on being usable and not tracking .dev.
I do hope people take the time to look at what goes into the stable branch and also send it to .dev when it is appropriate.
Philip
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
