Hello all, I'm in the process of building Angstrom for the first time for my SAM9G25-EK. I've been following the instructions here http://www.at91.com/linux4sam/bin/view/Linux4SAM/BuildAngstrom_9x5 and have been able to successfully build the base image (bitbake base-image). Making the console image (bitbake net-at91sam9-image) works fine until the final deploy steps. Here is the error message that I am seeing:
| * resolve_conffiles: Existing conffile /media/sda3/stuff/tmp/rootfs/net-at91sam9-image/etc/device_table is different from the conffile in the new package. The new conffile will be placed at /media/sda3/stuff/tmp/rootfs/net-at91sam9-image/etc/device_table-opkg. | * check_data_file_clashes: Package udev wants to install file /media/sda3/stuff/tmp/rootfs/net-at91sam9-image/lib/udev/hid2hci | But that file is already provided by package * bluez4 | * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package udev. NOTE: package net-at91sam9-image-1.0-r0: task do_rootfs: Failed ERROR: Function 'do_rootfs' failed (see /media/sda3/stuff/tmp/work/at91sam9x5ek-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/net-at91sam9-image-1.0-r0/temp/log.do_rootfs.4503 for further information) ERROR: Task 14 (/media/sda3/stuff/oe_at91sam/recipes/images/net-at91sam9-image.bb, do_rootfs) failed with exit code '1' ERROR: '/media/sda3/stuff/oe_at91sam/recipes/images/net-at91sam9-image.bb' failed So it appears there is some conflict between bluez4 and udev with the file hid2hci. However, I haven't found any more description than that. I'm guessing this means that both packages are trying to provide the same file, but I'm not sure which one should win in this case. Has anyone else had similar issues? If it helps, here's the build configuration information as it appeared near the start of the build: Build Configuration: BB_VERSION = "1.12.0" METADATA_BRANCH = "2011.03-maintenance" METADATA_REVISION = "ec639a6" TARGET_ARCH = "arm" TARGET_OS = "linux-gnueabi" MACHINE = "at91sam9x5ek" DISTRO = "angstrom" DISTRO_VERSION = "v20120327" TARGET_FPU = "soft" Any ideas on how to fix this conflict? Thanks, Bryan _______________________________________________ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel