Hi Frank,
In fact I had followed both conventions. I'm not quite sure what was
with this problematic package. Anyhow, I just stripped these
RDEPENDS_${PN} versions on the dependency branch - with no visible
change.
What I noticed from from image build with -D -D switches was that all
the runtime dependencies seemed to be set quite nicely, packages were
written etc. Only doubt regarding this package I found was:
"board-switch_1.0-r0.6_at91sam9260ek.ipk in Packages, but mtime
differs - re-reading"
And naturally, that package and all the packages it was depending on
were missing.
I'll try systematic RDEPENDS_${PN}. Hope that helps.
Thanks,
Matti
4. huhtikuuta 2012 16.54 Frank Agius <ftag...@yahoo.com> kirjoitti:
>
>
>
> On 4/3/2012 4:48 PM, matti kaasinen wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I have faced with a strange feature with Angstrom "2011.03-maintenance".
>> There is one package that does not get pulled to image with RDEPENDS
>> variable and all the packages it RDEPENDS on.
>
> Do you have it as "RDEPENDS" or "RDEPENDS_${PN}"? According to the
> migration guide
> (http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Migrating_metadata_to_OE-Core) the R*
> variables should always have a package name override, ie "RDEPENDS_${PN}".
>
>>
>> When I bitbake it with -c clean and run then bitbake for the targeted
>> image, this package seems to built all right ipk file is written, but
>> it is not included in the image.
>>
>> If I insert it to IMAGE_INSTALL list, it (and all the packages it
>> depends on) will be included in the image.
>> Do anyone have hints how to debug this?
>>
>> -Matti
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
> Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
_______________________________________________
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
