Hello All from Ed Vidal I have not changed any recipes. I have been trying with a current version of angstrom which downloads linux-omap_3.1.0-r1a. cd ~/angstrom/setup-scripts/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/deploy/images/pandaboard/ This creates the following files ls MLO MLO-pandaboard MLO-pandaboard-2011.12 modules-3.1.0-r1a-pandaboard.tgz README_-_DO_NOT_DELETE_FILES_IN_THIS_DIRECTORY.txt u-boot.img u-boot-pandaboard-2011.12-r8.img u-boot-pandaboard.img uImage uImage-3.1.0-r1a-pandaboard-20130103162548.bin uImage-pandaboard.bin I also have tried using meta-ti with yocto which creates the following files
u-boot-pandaboard-2011.12-r8.img u-boot-pandaboard.img uImage uImage-3.1.0-r1a-pandaboard-20130103162548.bin uImage-pandaboard.bin [vidal@ws009 pandaboard]$ cd ~/POKY/build122912_panda/poky/build/tmp/deploy/images/ [vidal@ws009 images]$ ls core-image-sato-sdk-pandaboard-20121230164443.rootfs.tar.bz2 core-image-sato-sdk-pandaboard-20130101172231.rootfs.tar.bz2 core-image-sato-sdk-pandaboard.tar.bz2 MLO MLO-pandaboard MLO-pandaboard-2011.12 modules--3.1.0-r0-pandaboard-20121230164443.tgz modules--3.1.0-r0-pandaboard-20130101172231.tgz README_-_DO_NOT_DELETE_FILES_IN_THIS_DIRECTORY.txt u-boot.img u-boot-pandaboard-2011.12-r8.img u-boot-pandaboard.img uImage uImage-3.1.0-r0-pandaboard-20121230164443.bin uImage-3.1.0-r0-pandaboard-20130101172231.bin The difference between uImage-3.1.0-r0-pandaboard-20121230164443.bin and uImage-3.1.0-r0-pandaboard-20130101172231.bin is I added to local.conf CMDLINE_DEBUG ?= "debug" to see if I could be some debug out of the boot process. All I get is Starting kernel ... Uncompressing Linux... done, booting the kernel. My angstrom build should be done shortly. May this will give a tar.vz2 file so I can test the kernel that I get above in ~/angstrom/setup-scripts/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/deploy/images/pandaboard/ As always any and all help will be appreciated. regards Ed Vidal On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Gary Thomas <g...@mlbassoc.com> wrote: > On 2013-01-03 11:40, Alan DuBoff wrote: > >> On Tue, 25 Dec 2012, Gary Thomas wrote: >> >> Please try to answer the question that was asked: what did you change in >>> the *recipe*?? >>> >> >> I *DID* answer, please go back and read my messages, here it is again for >> your convenience: >> >> setup-scripts/sources/meta-ti/**recipes-kernel/linux/linux-** >> ti33x-psp_3.2.bb <http://linux-ti33x-psp_3.2.bb> >> >> If you change the kernel version on that recipe it will build the image >> with that kernel, AFAICT. >> > > Exactly what do you mean? Did you actually change the recipe (i.e. edit > the file > mentioned above)? Or did you try to select that kernel via some other > means? If > so, how? > > If you'll be more explicit about how you are trying to get this alternate > kernel to be used, we can help figure out why it's not working for you. > > > >> The kernel and the modules [package] have to match or else you'll have >>> problems. >>> >> >> They do. I've included the kernel-modules in my recipes. >> > > query: why isn't this discussion on the meta-ti list where the supporters > of this recipe (and layer) hang out? > > > -- > ------------------------------**------------------------------ > Gary Thomas | Consulting for the > MLB Associates | Embedded world > ------------------------------**------------------------------ > > ______________________________**_________________ > Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list > Angstrom-distro-devel@**linuxtogo.org<Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org> > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/** > angstrom-distro-devel<http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel> > _______________________________________________ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-devel
