On 7/12/07, John Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right. Got that. So back to my original question about installing on > to an SD... > > If I install ipkg-utils now, so that it and the space-eating python > go on the SD, will at least ipkg-link still work so I can ipkg-link > all the libraries/apps that thus far are un-linked? Or will it too > fail? i.e. do I have to install it on / root? >
I would suggest installing ipkg-link to root. > And why so little space left for / root anyway? Dare I mention how > much I had with pdaXrom (think I already did). Just intrigued. > Perhaps the angstrom image installs more? > Thanks > > John > > On 12 Jul 2007, at 20:13, Junqian Gordon Xu wrote: > > > Justin Patrin wrote: > >> Ah.....why doesn't our base image include ipkg-utils? > >> > > Becasue Angstrom is not Zaurus centric, some other products/projects > > don't need ipkg-utils. Also ipkg-utils depends on python, which > > eats up > > quite a bit of space. I think that's a concern for including in the > > base-image. But, I agree with you that certain Z devices need to have > > ipkg-utils installed as default. > > > > Gordon > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Angstrom-distro-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro- > > users > > > _______________________________________________ > Angstrom-distro-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-users > -- Justin Patrin _______________________________________________ Angstrom-distro-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/angstrom-distro-users
