Hi Daniel, Can you point me to that section? I could not find it on JSON.org neighter in the ecma 404 spec<http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/ECMA-404.pdf>. (that name still cracks me up ;) ) I just read the json rfc (wasn't aware of that one!) and it is indeed stated in there. Still, the rfc isn't the formal standard, the ecma 404 is, and in there it's not! So, formally speaking, it *is technically correct. * however I do think it's a bad idea to use it like that! and most parsers don't parse it correctly!
Regards Sander -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AngularJS" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
