thanks but in your example the transcluded content is still rendered twice
- but I get the gist. I guess I am surprised that transcludeFn cannot
simply return the desired transcluded clone. after all - if I understand
correctly, the purpose of that function is to give directive programmer an
opportunity to alter transcluded content. so why not:
1) interpret return value as new transcluded content
2) if return value is undefined use 'clone' (from
transcludeFn(function(clone){}) as transcluded content
...seems unnecessary to force client programmer to do extra push-ups of
locating clone's parent node.
-nikita
On Thursday, January 23, 2014 8:17:30 PM UTC-8, Sander Elias wrote:
>
> Hi Nikita,
>
> I agree that a more angular solution for this is feasible. At least there
> isn't one I'm aware of. But of coarse you don't need jQuery for this!
> have a look: http://plnkr.co/edit/xhrBVaqQXCZHXpHw3Z0L?p=preview
>
> just usings the DOM's own api!
>
> Regards
> Sander
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"AngularJS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
