Right. I'm proposing a change to the algorithm. I'll see what I come up with and see if anyone is interested in a PR.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 1:48 AM, Luke Kende <[email protected]> wrote: > Nope. That's not how it works... you must specify the routes in order of > literals first as Sander mentioned, and, as you found when trying it out. > Precedence is given on first rule that matches, not on looking through all > the rules and guessing what the user wants. > > > On Monday, March 3, 2014 11:46:42 AM UTC-7, Matt Hughes wrote: >> >> Well, the router could take that into account, no? If it has two routes >> that match and one has a literal and the other has a matcher, the literal >> should have precedence. >> >> On Saturday, March 1, 2014 12:41:18 AM UTC-5, Sander Elias wrote: >>> >>> Hi Matt, >>> >>> Short answer, No. >>> Somewhat longer, the /:bar is a 'catch all' construct. How can it know >>> that you don't want to handle 'baz' as an variable? >>> In this case it is very obvious, but if your router grows, or is build >>> more dynamically that might not be the case. >>> >>> Regards >>> Sander >>> >>> >>> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "AngularJS" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/angular/iJO1LqjbsXI/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AngularJS" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
