Yeah, we are using the '{[{ }]}' syntax to prevent our Angular template
interpolation from colliding with Django's, which is powering our app.Great advice all around! I appreciate it. We are indeed recursively building a tree, and this piece renders an icon on each row based on the state of the row and position of the row in the hierarchy. This could be repeated hundreds of times, so performance is definitely a concern. I will share with my team. Thanks! William *--* *William Huster* m1 | (202) 255-8444 m2 | (317) 709-3425 On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Sander Elias <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Luke, > > You are not wrong. Those function calls are hurting the javascript part of > the performance. However, javascript performance is seldom the culprit. In > this case it might be a good idea, because it probably is used recursive! > I like the idea you proposed here, however, your current proposal will > only work after being clicked at least once. I think that might be a > problem here. > > Regards > Sander > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "AngularJS" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/angular/W2MoRfpZEs0/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AngularJS" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
