Angular is very powerful and capable, but the documentation is terse and severely lacking in enough and appropriate examples, and in guidance on optimal working methods. It appears to have been written by the architects, with far too little understanding of the newcomer perspective.
The success of Angular is highly predicated on the ease of uptake, and for such a complex framework, this is critical. In the absence of good documentation, the growing Angular 'knowledge' is fragmented and distributed across many web sites, many offering unique and potentially quirky solutions to coding difficulties. I spent a few months writing www.angularbasics.co.uk with the aim of providing a starting point and reference for newcomers. It teaches from the outside in, starting with html and leading into Angular syntax. Most sites, including the Google one offer Angular syntax as the starting point - a catch-22 situation for newcomers. I would like to know if Google agrees with my viewpoint and will therefore seek to address the problem. I wrote www.delphibasics.co.uk in 2002/3 for a similar situation. The documentation shortfall remains, to the detriment of users. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AngularJS" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
