Dude, nice try, however you are sooo out of context here. I've ran your tests, trying not to be petulant. Your performance test, that adds a bunch of lines to a list, actually rendered faster than AngularJS ng-repeat. However, none of the lines have live bindings, so nope, it's not better.
And I've read your code too. Now that's a crazy shit. You don't even think about unit testing, do you? You cleary come from a jQuery background, since you use the same ".fn." syntax. Also, beautiful API? Nope. I am a experienced AngularJS dev, and I love the way it works. No way I'd leave the awesomeness of Angular for a bunch of chained Javascript calls just to make a template. HTML is for markup, JS is for behavior. Don't mix things! "because it only uses pure javascript code; no thing such as template and strange attibutes like ng-model or data-bind." Yeah, AngularJS is written in Java, compiled to Fortran and runs on a IBM mainframe. No Javascript at all. So, my opinion: nope, not, nein, não. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AngularJS" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
