Well, sharing the scope of the parent using normal directive techniques is
still an option and doesn't require element navigation. Plus, it maintains
the separation of presentation from scopes (in this case directive scope
rather than controller scope). It was that against which I was evaluating
ngNode. NgNode seemed interesting as more of a one-off composite-maker
trick. As you point out the implementation has a flaw, but the larger
question might be whether there is some way to do shorthand for one-off
composite directives, or whether the existing options are at about the
right level with respect to required effort to connect the pieces.
On Jun 1, 2014 2:34 AM, "Gabriel Aszalos" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks Daphne! While I also agree this is very interesting it is also very
> flawed. It only just came to my attention that in a scenario where, for
> example, you would have a button directive with an ng-node in its template,
> that is used in multiple places in the same view would break the service
> due to multiple ng-nodes having the same name in the same view.
>
> It would be nice if there was a clean way to bind $node exclusively to its
> parent directive, but I doubt there is. The only way would be to add it
> into Angular itself. To me it feels that something like this would be very
> handy and would make code nicer, cleaner, easier to manage and faster.
>
> On Sunday, 1 June 2014, Daphne Maddox <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> This is interesting.  I'm trying to decide how I feel about it -- you're
>> granting the parent directive the role of coordinating arbitrary child
>> elements. I think I like it but something is nagging at me. It might take
>> me a little while to put my finger on it. In your example, you don't show
>> it using transclusion, is that right?
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, May 31, 2014 2:49:00 PM UTC-7, Gabriel Aszalos wrote:
>>>
>>> I have developed a 314 byte helper service to help access HTML Elements
>>> on template from within directives easier. Inspired from Dojo's
>>> "data-dojo-attach-point". Feedback is appreciated :)
>>>
>>> https://github.com/backslashed/ngNode
>>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>> Google Groups "AngularJS" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/angular/Elos01C9ftI/unsubscribe.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>> [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "AngularJS" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/angular/Elos01C9ftI/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"AngularJS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to