I was following the dev guide (https://docs.angularjs.org/guide/directive) on isolated scope and was not experiencing the described behaviour. The section that describes the behaviour of the transclude option mentioned that if the transclude wasn't included the expression would have resolved to the isolated scope value, in this case the name 'Jeff'. I didn't experience this behaviour, as the binding was made to the external scope.
I realized this has changed between version 1.0.8 (http://jsfiddle.net/TheManFran/wqSeJ/1/) and version 1.2.0 (http://jsfiddle.net/TheManFran/CbLcw/1/). I can't find any documentation that explains this change. Can anyone please point me to the documentation or is this an issue? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AngularJS" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
