As mentioned by others, the first fear is probably moot.

A more relevant concern is if there is a risk Angular is going to be the 
new GWT.  I don't think GWT has fared well in a post Google environment.  
Probably not a concern for Angular due to Angular being significantly 
simpler and the community being stronger (GWT was a bit niche product due, 
so I think it was doomed from day one from getting a significant community 
behind it).

Anyway, thought I would mention it.

On Tuesday, 10 June 2014 03:53:50 UTC+10, jorupp wrote:
>
> In the course of a couple of recent projects, I've gotten some push-back 
> from others related to the project with a couple of fears I've been trying 
> to put to rest, but I figured there were better arguments available than 
> what I'd found so far.
>
> The first is a fear about using a core technology (AngularJS) for our 
> application that comes from Google, a company that has in the past dropped 
> services for one reason or another - Reader, Wave, Buzz, etc. (
> http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/map_of_the_week/2013/03/google_reader_joins_graveyard_of_dead_google_products.html).
>  
>  There's a fear that one day, Google may decide that they no longer need 
> AngularJS and discontinue an updates for it, leaving us on an orphaned 
> platform.  I know we'd always be able to continue to use the last-released 
> version, and I'd like to think that the community would continue to push it 
> in that case, but the fear still persists.  Several of the current heavy 
> contributors are Google employees, but are there many contributors that 
> aren't affiliated with Google in some way?
>
> The second also is related to Google - basically, there's a fear that good 
> IE support in Angular isn't a priority since it's made by a rival 
> (Microsoft).  I tried to explain how dropping IE8 support in 1.3 (
> http://blog.angularjs.org/2013/12/angularjs-13-new-release-approaches.html) 
> isn't something aimed at Microsoft specifically due to a rivalry (which I'd 
> argue is more of a Microsoft -> Google thing than a Google->Microsoft 
> thing), but rather trying to focus efforts for new APIs on browsers used on 
> the modern web.  Dropping IE8 doesn't seem to have in any way changed the 
> focus on excellent support for all modern browsers.  Besides, unless IE 
> suddenly goes to near-0 marketshare, not supporting current versions of IE 
> well would be suicide for any project (like Angular) aimed at building 
> slick, general-purpose websites.  Chrome/FF/Safari-only isn't something any 
> general framework could realistically do.
>
> Anyway, any thoughts/references on the subject would be appreciated,
>
> - jorupp
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"AngularJS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to