I'm having trouble making the connection from that article.
Previously, I had:
.factory('Utility', function($http) {
return {
getList: function() {
return $http.get('getList.html');
}
}
I've just switched to this to prevent the number of remote calls:
.factory('Utility', function($http) {
var aList = [];
$http.get('getList.html').then(
function(result) {
aList = result;
}
);
return {
getList: function() {
return aList;
}
}
And while this is working, I still feel like I'm just getting lucky with
the timing. Are you saying there's a way I can accomplish this using a
provider instead? I see that they have the benefit of the configuration
phase, but aren't other services (i.e. http) unavailable during that time?
On Friday, September 12, 2014 2:42:46 AM UTC-7, dinesh kumar wrote:
>
> for q1:
> this is where you use *provider*.for difference,check this link
> <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15666048/service-vs-provider-vs-factory>
> .
> for q2:
> i Think that is ok to do it.
>
> Thanks,
> Dinesh kumar.L
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"AngularJS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
