Well, Yes, Tony you are right i'm not very polite sorry for than, but i'm absolutely respecting job done by Angular Team. And i'm worrying about Angular technology future. Without emotions my arguments bellow: 1) At lest tens of thousands developers are using angularjs now 2) All of them invested they own time and money in educating angularjs - architecture, patterns, best practices and etc 2.1) a lot of money invested in creating commercial applications on base of angular 3) AngularJS by itself has quite strong entrance barrier, much higher than jquery for example 4) For most of developers current AngualrJS knowledge by itself strong investment 5) A lot of people wrote components (directives, jscode, templates) on base of current arictecture 6) AngularJS platform (base core library + components) are growing every day 7) when you are changing architecture so radically your are resetting investments of points 4,5,6 8) A lot of people relying on Angular instead of http://emberjs.com/ and others for example, because of google and because they know that you have resources for supporting and improving it 9) when you are publishing on your presentation RIP image with Angular caption - the first question is "WTF?", "Why i invested so much time to rely on that guys, who make such decision in one day" 10) I had not any doubt in talent and excellence of Angular Team and i'm absolutely sure than new version of AngularJS 2.0 will have more faster performance and better architectural patterns, that will solve important issues for we development 11) But i'm absolutely sure that it will be new framework and i should invest my own life time in education of new technology 12). And i'm sure that you will close AngularJS 2.0 in couple years and RIP it, and propose us new Angular 3.0 framework 13) ES 6 now yet supported on most of platforms 14) AtScript is additional barrier for entrance, with really questionable competitive advantage against base JavaScript language 15) There still a lot of thing you could develop in current Angular library - for example make standardisation of package manager 16) You could support and develop Mobile Angular 17) You could invest money in third party developers of angular components 18) You could do work more closely with W3C and developer of browsers for standartization of key components (2 way databinding, web components, routing, etc) 19) And i could tell you a lot of usefull for web developers points that you could make, instead of developing new arch patterns 20) Because of this arguments your strategy for me looks immature, it looks like you are going to play with new architecture patterns instead of focusing of real demand of the market
I really think that AngularJS are playing key role in modern web development and i'm really care about your strategy. I think there are big risk that your decision strategically not efficient and Angular will lose power of influence and trust of community. I see that you have excellent potential as a team to influence on web much more. Thanks, Alex вторник, 11 ноября 2014 г., 12:24:04 UTC+4 пользователь tonypee написал: > > Actually, I think your comments are more rude and immature. The angular > team have done a great job in providing you a product free of charge. It is > mature and open source. There is no reason that it will not be supported by > the (huge) community that it has, and have much more life. > > Now, the angular team is working hard to build the best framework for the > future, free of backward compatibility issues, and using new browser > features, and because of this you accuse them of betraying you? They are > once again working FOR you. For free. > > You don't need to abandon your code. 1.x is mature and production ready. > Do you think that this will magically disintegrate because they start > working on a divergent project?? Please think before you open your mouth > > On Monday, November 10, 2014, Raul Vieira <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> Maybe this will make you feel better: >> >> >> http://eisenbergeffect.bluespire.com/all-about-angular-2-0/?utm_source=javascriptweekly&utm_medium=email >> >> Raul >> >> On Nov 10, 2014, at 8:41 PM, Alexey Dubovtsev <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> To Development Team, >> >> Today I read about Angular 2.0. ( >> http://ng-learn.org/2014/03/AngularJS-2-Status-Preview/) >> As we mentioned before <http://ng-learn.org/2014/01/AngularJS-2/>, this >> is not a complex major update; this is a whole rewrite! >> What does that **ing means?? >> Even more when i read more about new architecture i was shocked. This is >> new framework at all. >> >> I really don't understand your position, why you so irresponsible. >> If you want to play with new technologies, if you want to practice >> yourself in new architecture you are welcome to make a new product. >> Your decision to change angular architecture and core principle in >> version 2.0 is a total disaster. >> It seems to me that you a really don't understand that a lot of people >> are relying on you, and you are betraying them. >> You are destroying a trust to you. >> >> I really like AngularJS framework and invested a lot of money in apps >> written on it. And i wish to stay with it, and wish to rely on your team. >> I really don't understand why i should throw out my code or why i should >> spend my time and money to transfer on the architecture, because you decide >> to play. >> But when you are telling to the community that you are just playing toys >> and going to implement some new cool architecture i really stoping respect >> you. >> >> I suggest you become more mature. Stay with Angular current architecture, >> and if you want to play with new technologies and toys - just a create new >> product. >> >> Thanks, >> Alex >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "AngularJS" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "AngularJS" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > > -- > Tony Polinelli > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AngularJS" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
