Not sure how your switch statement plans on being implemented but couldn't
you do this:
<directive-name obj-name="{{obj.name}"
obj-val="{{obj.val}}"></directive-name>
angular.directive('directiveName',directiveName);
function directiveName() {
var directive = {
restrict:'E',
templateUrl: 'directive-name.html',
scope: {
objName: '@objName',
objVal: '@objVal'
}
}
return directive;
}
Then put the switch in the directive-name.html and use scope.objName and
scope.objVal?
On Saturday, June 27, 2015 at 7:23:36 PM UTC-5, John Grant wrote:
>
> I'd like to be able to do this:
> *<div ng-attr-{{obj.name <http://obj.name>}}="{{obj.val}} />*
>
> as well as
> *<div ng-attr-{{obj.name <http://obj.name>}} />*
>
> and possibly even this:
> *<{{obj.name <http://obj.name>}} />*
>
>
> My understanding is that this is not currently possible. I'm using v1.3.16.
>
> A common pattern for me is to leverage directives, and to use different
> directives to create a custom look when my data has different values in it.
> I am currently writing giant ng-switch permutations to use the desired
> directive. I want to specify the name of the directive with my data.
>
> Since 'ng-attr-cx' can be used to produce the 'cx' dom attribute, I feel
> like this is within reach.
>
> Thanks for any help understanding the issues.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"AngularJS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
