Hi Sander, That's great - thank you very much. When you say that's the case in Angular 1.x, is it changing in Angular 2.x?
Cheers, Kelvin On Tuesday, 22 September 2015 06:12:16 UTC+1, Sander Elias wrote: > > Hi Keldar, > > For purity and maintainability it should indeed. Imagine yourself reusing > the module app.hub in another project, so you copy the corresponding js > files, and your done. But now suddenly it's not working anymore. After > hours of debugging you find out, that it's missing it's dependency...... > > However, in angular 1.x there is no technical reason to do this. The > current module system and injector keeps a flat list. That means that all > dependencies are in 1 big long list, and the injector will always find what > it needs in there. It's also a big downside, as this makes naming > collisions a real PITA. (for example, if you have 2 modules that have an > 'list' and a 'edit' directive, you end up with 1 of them. And it seems > random which one. > > Regards > Sander > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AngularJS" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/angular. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
