Hi, my client, Sprint (Wireless brand) need some assistance. I was hoping someone can help answer his question below.
Thanks! Sonal Our 3.0 site redesign is set up with AngularJS. For paid search campaigns for our devices, we need to be able to send customers to the device detail pages. However, after a couple of months now, I still am not seeing these pages rise above our older 2.0 pages (pages for mobile and separate pages for desktop). Part of the problem is that we don’t have canonical links on the 2.0 pages pointing to the new responsive design 3.0 pages, but a larger problem is it doesn’t appear the the Googlebot is seeing the pages correctly. What I want to do is make sure that the way we have created the urls is done correctly and that the canonicals are written correctly and the AngularJS is difficult for me to test against. Our quality scores were on the low side and this , in part, is the results from pages that Google can’t see or can’t determine if the pages are the authoritative pages. We need to get canonicals in place, but we’ re not sure if we have the url structure formatted correctly in the canonicals and whether the url format is costing us as well. Could you have someone take a look at the examples in the email thread below and tell me if we are doing this correctly? Another question related to this is the url and whether it is SEO friendly. Can someone confirm whether providing an SEO friendly url ( http://www.sprint.com/shop/#!/device/61500191 versus http://www.sprint.com/shop/device/Kyocera-DuraPlus) matters for Google? Site url http://www.sprint.com/shop/#!/device/61500191 Google should go to: http://sprint.com/shop/?_escaped_fragment_=device/61500191 And Get this result: http://sprint.com/snapshots/shop/device/61500191.html So, since one question is about how our canonicals look, the first question is 1. Do we need to create a pretty url (includes keywords like this http://www.sprint.com/shop/#!/device/61500191 versus http://www.sprint.com/shop/device/Kyocera-DuraPlus or even http://www.sprint.com/shop/#!/device/61500191 versus http://www.sprint.com/shop/device/Kyocera-DuraPlus/61500191) or does Google ignore the pretty URL? 2. Have we built our canonicals correctly? <link id="dynamic-canonical" rel="canonical" href=" https://sprint.com/shop/#!/device/61500191?tabId=plnTab6900002&planSkuId=93900012&skuId=61500191&duration=24&contractType=easyPay&itemId=KYE4233KIT "> This is important because we need to get canonicals that match the 3.0 canonicals placed on our 2.0 shop pages pointing to the 3.0 pages and want to use the same url I bekieve. Our snapshot files look like this http://sprint.com/snapshots/shop/device/61500191.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AngularJS" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/angular. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
