Ah sorry, noticed a typo in my previous post. I meant to write "Paging is out of the question in terms of UX" (for this case <- that part was implicit). Not sure if you clicked the link or not, but that app doesn't have a normal table - it's a collection of pictures...for gamers....for a game in which having 500+ units is a normal thing, so I'm fairly certain that users don't have a problem with too many items on the list. At least I haven't had any complaints in that matter.
On Monday, November 21, 2016 at 4:22:32 PM UTC+1, Sander Elias wrote: > > Hi Krzysztof, > > Can you show me a real UX study that favours a huge table instead of a > paged one? I have read numerous science based ones that favour interfaces > with fewer items available. Humans seem to have a problem processing UX > with more as 200 items in it. > I'm really interested in this, perhaps minds have shifted! > > Regards > Sander > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Angular" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/angular. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
