OK so my misunderstanding was that i assumed that the performance improvements were in the front end (with it being a JS library) but what I am understanding here is that the performance improvements actually more full stack. So Node plays a big part there for that reason.
I think for this project I am going to stick with Angular 1 as I just want to run a basic Apache, SQL, PHP & JS settup. I don't really want to be adding in and other dependencies. PS. I was making a comparison between ASP.NET MVC and Angular2 not suggesting that I have to use it for Angular to work. I just worded it a little badly. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Angular and AngularJS discussion" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/angular. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
