Although I use AngularJS, with respect to ASP>NET/MVC, it is the same as Angular 2 just a different library. (It would apply to a jQuery app also.)
For 90% of the pages, it is written in pure html & js. No need for ASP>NET/MVC. Typical display screens and save data using web api to the server. BUT, 10% of the pages need to access the a user's local file system. (The reason is incidental.) That is the only reason I have to use ASP>NET/MVC . On Tuesday, June 6, 2017 at 3:26:21 AM UTC-4, Daniel Bolton wrote: > > What do you gain by using ASP.NET/MVC, if you are developing a purely > Single Page Application using Angular 2? > > E.g. I've seen various tutorials about using Visual Studio Code and > Angular 2.0 that does not leverage the ASP.NET framework at all. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Angular and AngularJS discussion" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/angular. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
