trying to figure out the difference, pros and cons, of defining schemes to define routes.
So from my reading you can have a route *forRoot* and *forChildren*. Another way of doing it is to define all routes as part of *RouterModule.forRoot(routes) * and having children routes defined there as well... Can someone explain why one would choose one over the other? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Angular and AngularJS discussion" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/angular. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
