Hi,

I was looking at draft-ciavaglia-anima-coordination, and noticed that although
it mentions several possible algorithms for coordination, they are mainly aimed
at avoiding simultaneous actions by competing ASAs.

Is there also scope for applying explicit consensus-forming algorithms as well?
There is quite a large literature on consensus algorithms, mainly starting with
Paxos. I'm not saying that any of that is directly applicable to Anima, but it
seems like a closely related problem space.

What I did notice is that all consensus algorithms seem to assume that at any
one moment, there is a designated "master" that is in effect the arbitrator.
It would be nice to avoid that, if possible. It isn't clear to me whether
draft-ciavaglia-anima-coordination assumes that the actual coordination
function runs in a specific master.

Regards
   Brian

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to