Dear Sheng and Toerless, ANIMA WG,

We kindly ask for the following time slots:

_Slot #1_
    -Name of time slot: Autonomic Functions Coordination By The Example.
-Name of draft(s): draft-ciavaglia-anima-coordination-01, draft-peloso-anima-autonomic-function-01 -Time requested: minimum 20 minutes (we need to run through the example to make the demonstration useful)
    -Presenter name(s): Laurent Ciavaglia, Pierre Peloso.
    -Brief description of what issues need discussing and what you hope to
    accomplish by presenting (please focus on open issues, rather than a
status update): The presentation will show how AF interactions (e.g. conflicts) are identified and resolved with concrete examples, mapped to the ANIMA components and outline new requirements. The goal is to expose the importance of coordination as a special role ASA and the need to define the appropriate mechanism/specifications to support it efficiently in the ANIMA framework.


_Slot #2_
    -Name of time slot: Autonomic Functions Life-cycle and Management.
    -Name of draft(s): draft-peloso-anima-autonomic-function-01
    -Time requested: 15 minutes
    -Presenter name(s): Laurent Ciavaglia, Pierre Peloso.
    -Brief description of what issues need discussing and what you hope to
    accomplish by presenting (please focus on open issues, rather than a
status update): The presentation proposes a life-cycle for autonomic functions and describes what common management components are needed to support the deployment and operation of autonomic functions in the ANIMA framework, and how they could be mapped wrt. the ANI.


_Slot #3_
    -Name of time slot: ANIMA Intent Policy.
    -Name of draft(s): draft-du-anima-an-intent-03
-Time requested: 10 minutes (+enough time to discuss with the WG about way forward)
    -Presenter name(s): One of the I-D authors.
    -Brief description of what issues need discussing and what you hope to
    accomplish by presenting (please focus on open issues, rather than a
status update): Update on the definition and use of Intent in the ANIMA framework and discuss way forward.


Thanks, best regards, Laurent.



On 28/06/2016 16:35, Sheng Jiang wrote:
Hi, all anima,

We have requested two sessions of 2 hour + 2 hour for the ANIMA WG meeting for 
IETF-96 (Berlin, Germany) and are starting to collect agenda items for these 
sessions. Same with previous IETF meetings, we do not reserve the second 
session for non-charter work items. It says the charter work item would have 
priority. We will only discuss non-charter work items till we finish charter 
work items. However, we do have a longer second session. So, hopefully, we 
could have more time for discussion of non-charter work items. The priority 
among these non-charter work items would be: these that have active discussion 
in mail list,
then these have submitted drafts, and topics without drafts.

Please send us (anima-chairs at tools.ietf.org) requests for sessions by March 
3rd, Thursday (IETF requests the preliminary agenda by July 6th, Wednesday) and 
include:
Name of time slot:
Name of draft(s):
Time requested:
Presenter name(s):
Brief description of what issues need discussing and what you hope to
accomplish by presenting (please focus on open issues, rather than a
status update):

More details about the IETF 96, Berlin, Germany can be found at:
http://www.ietf.org/meeting/96/index.html

Again, presenters and draft authors please invoke active discussions in
the ANIMA list. We have very limited time for each topic in the
face-to-face meeting. Mail list is a very good place to discuss and reach
consensus on technical issues.

Best regards,

Toerless & Sheng
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to