Hi, Thanks for this. One point raises some questions in my mind:
> 5. Intent splitting (on each node): Intent is split into sections, > one for the ANI itself, others for specific Autonomic Functions. > ASAs are notified if there is new Intent for them. Some intent > sections may not apply to a particular node. Now each component > of a node (ANI, all ASAs) know their respective Intent. I am wondering why, in this case, Intent would be broadcasted in a single operation as a single file. Why wouldn't we simply send out each section separately? Also, how is the relevance for each ASA known? And is that the correct granularity of the section? Maybe the granularity should be individual objectives, or certain groups of objectives? I think this needs more discussion. Regards Brian On 09/07/2016 03:45, Laurent Ciavaglia wrote: > Dear ANIMA WG, > > FYI: a new version of the I-D has been posted. > > The main update is the addition of a section on Intent Life Cycle based on > the initial text provided by Michael Behringer > (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/rk2CgO62nmXFuKOBX-Gtb5v0p5E). > Michael is now also co-author of the I-D. > > *We've asked the ANIMA WG chairs for a slot at IETF96/Berlin to present the > updates on this draft and report on the discussion > on Intent and way forward.** > **Your comments are thus highly welcome before the meet**ing**.* > > Best regards, Laurent. > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-du-anima-an-intent-04.txt > Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 08:39:49 -0700 > From: [email protected] > To: Laurent Ciavaglia <[email protected]>, Jeferson > Campos Nobre <[email protected]>, Michael > Behringer <[email protected]>, Sheng Jiang <[email protected]>, Zongpeng > Du <[email protected]>, Michael H. Behringer > <[email protected]>, Laurent Ciavaglia <[email protected]> > > > > A new version of I-D, draft-du-anima-an-intent-04.txt > has been successfully submitted by Laurent Ciavaglia and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-du-anima-an-intent > Revision: 04 > Title: ANIMA Intent Policy and Format > Document date: 2016-07-08 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 13 > URL: > https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-du-anima-an-intent-04.txt > Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-du-anima-an-intent/ > Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-du-anima-an-intent-04 > Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-du-anima-an-intent-04 > > Abstract: > One of the goals of autonomic networking is to simplify the > management of networks by human operators. Intent Based Networking > (IBN) is a possible approach to realize this goal. With IBN, the > operator indicates to the network what to do (i.e. her intent) and > not how to do it. In the field of Policy Based Management (PBM), the > concept of intent is called a declarative policy. This document > proposes a refinement of the intent concept initially defined in > [RFC7575] for autonomic networks by providing a more complete > definition, a life-cycle, some use cases and a tentative format of > the ANIMA Intent Policy. > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > The IETF Secretariat > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Anima mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima > _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
