On 19/07/2016 21:56, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> wrote: > > 1. Most network devices i deal with do not do mDNS. > > i do not know enough IoT devices to have opinions about those, but > > i wonder how important those are re. existing anima charter. > > I am not mostly *not* thinking about tiny constrained motes here. > > I'm thinking about various appliance-like things: the home NAS, the iDRAC/ILO > service processor, etc. > > *THESE* devices might not run GRASP. > They *might* want to join the ACP. > They *do* want to do secure bootstrap. > They already have mDNS. > > Or to put it another way: I'm thinking about the light controller, not the > lightblubs.
1) the concept of a 'lightblub' is very appealing. 2) on balance, I think I agree with Michael slightly more than with Toerless. Even though this use case is strictly outside the Anima charter, I think we'd look very silly if the autonomic security bootstrap could cope with routers and application devices such as autonomic energy management boxes, but not with lighting controllers. Brian _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
