Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree too. But there's an inevitable risk. One use case for this is a > little bit 'back to the future' - consider ASAs that act as bandwidth > brokers. Network > A has a bandwidth broker. Network B has a bandwidth broker. They > communicate > between domains using separate TLS-based GRASP instances. Faulty > information > from A contaminates B's state, in complete security.
Sure.. but I'll bet that it's more reliable than the old-fashioned way of picking up the telephone or the email, and say, "So, Bob, how much transit did we buy again from you this week?" -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
