Hi Brian, On 11/2/16 8:09 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Firstly, no, I have no pixie dust, and I agree that we need to preserve > security even after a disaster. But on the other hand, if autonomic > networks matter at all, they will matter then, and we can't safely assume > that network operators are available even to switch on some sort of emergency > MASA server. Also, how would a temporary tactical network used by emergency > responders configure itself if no vendor MASA server is accessible? > > I'm not suggesting that the basic BRSKI mechanisms need to solve this, > but I think we need to have it on the list of issues to be tackled before > we can consider Anima complete.
Before we start imagining what the requirements in such situations are, are they at all written somewhere? Otherwise we run the risk of inventing a lot of mechanism to deal with a non-existent use case. Eliot
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
