Sheng Jiang <[email protected]> wrote: > We have a full agenda for Friday session. Since you do not apply a time > slot, I don't think I have any spare time could allocate.
okay, I thought we might have some open mic time, because this really wants
discussion.
> I am not sure how you want to have the content for this document. If
> you want to integrate it into bootstrap document, it is simple straight
> forward. But, if you want to process it as an independent document, we
> need to consultant our AD. Let's do it offline.
And Terry says:
Terry Manderson <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm comfortable in the WG considering this as a WG document if that is
> the consensus of the WG and I think that can be done on-list and not
> wait until chicago. The corollary to that is cross WG review is a must
> have due to the significant YANG content in the document. Further if
> this document is accepted as a WG document I would very much like a
> non-chair document shepherd assigned at adoption to ensure that the
> appropriate reviews happen.
Benoit, do you feel the same?
Again, we don't care where we do it. We know it's going to at least Max, Kent
and I. It makes no sense to do it three times, so we'll have one document
for 6tisch, ANIMA and NETCONF.
Based upon this, we'll probably ask the chairs for a document adoption call
in January.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
