Hello Brian,
I probably should have said more. I just meant that such nodes ought to
be allowed to have some network interfaces that do not participate in
GRASP. Please excuse the unclear brevity of my remark.
Regards,
Charlie P.
On 3/1/2017 5:25 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Hi Charlie,
While reviewing your comments, I came upon one that I don't understand:
3.5.6.1. Flooding
...
A GRASP device with multiple link-layer interfaces (typically a
router) MUST support synchronization flooding on all interfaces. If
it receives a multicast Flood Synchronization message on a given
interface, it MUST relay it by re-issuing a Flood Synchronization
message on its other interfaces. The relayed message MUST have the
same Session ID as the incoming message and MUST be tagged with the
IP address of its original initiator.
CEP: I am pretty sure this is a mistake.
Why, please? Running code says it works fine.
Regards
Brian
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
