The question that occurs to me is whether the pre-ACP discovery phase
needs privacy protection.
The answer is not obvious, since the scope is limited (where DNS queries
can go arbitrary distances across the net.)
Yours,
Joel
On 3/11/17 2:20 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 12/03/2017 08:08, Michael Richardson wrote:
I haven't read the document yet, just the abstract.
I am not suggesting it, just relaying that this privacy issue seems to be
something others have recognized as a concern.
Do you see it as a concern inside the ACP? I would have thought not.
We have intentionally punted on ASA authorization for now, but it seems to
me that an authorization system for ASAs (is ASA X allowed to access
objective Y?) would cover the issue.
The GRASP spec has a few words starting:
"Generally speaking, no personal information is expected to be
involved in the signaling protocol, so there should be no direct
impact on personal privacy..."
Brian
Subject: [dnssd] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnssd-privacy-01.txt
...
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
