Pierre Pfister <pierre.pfis...@darou.fr> wrote:
> Absolutely. RFC7695 Applicability Statement (Section 3.) explains that
> the algorithm can be used as
> long as participating nodes gets configured with an eventually
> consistent set of non-overlaping prefixes,
> which are then used to carve-out sub-prefixes that are assigned to
> link/nodes/objects/toasters.I think that I can envision a situation where a largish distributed enterprise could use auto-configuring Homenet technology in a "Small Office" configuration, and would use a CASM/ANIMA mechanism at the edge to ask for more address space from HQ. (That could well be occuring via a VPN, or some dark fiber, doesn't matter) In that case, the HNCP and ANIMA parts would be in a common trust environment. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
