Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Benjamin:
...
> The control plane can be adapted, certainly quite easily. But a key
> question is whether or not the data plane can be adapted to use RPL's
> RPI or not.
> The RPI is how RPL signals its instances and manages routing failures.
...
> RPL can work without it, we do that in ANIMA for wired use cases (see
> draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-06). But that means quickly
> repairing any damage, which is probably not good for battery operated
> devices.
It wasn't clear to me that we were specifying the ACP to operate RPL without
RPI. It was a bug that I was going to try to get fixed.
I also was thinking about how useofrplinfo (and rfc2460bis header
insertion...) applied to the ACP, and what compromises we could make given
the apparent new views.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
