Sheng Jiang <jiangsh...@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hi, authors of draft-ietf-anima-voucher,
> I am doing a thorough review as the document shepherd with my ANIMA
okay. We'll work through these on Tuesday (tomorrow).
> A few DISCUSS & EDNOTE from editor notes should be removed.
Well, they are there to keep us from advancing the document with issues
unresolved :-)
> The normative words in design consideration seems odd for me. The
> design consideration means not protocol definition neither behavior
> specification although security consideration may be specification in
> my eyes. It should not have normative words.
Perhaps naming it Design Considerations is the error.
I don't see the normative words there as wrong; they need to be there.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
