Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > We need to resolve this issue quickly, to get a new draft out in the next > few days, before the IESG meeting next week.
> So, since I haven't seen any opinions on the issue below, I propose to
> delete the UDP paragraph as suggested below. Note that this does not
> prevent us adding a UDP mode later, but it removes the confusion that we
> have in the text today.
So, we will (initially) support UDP for multicasted Link-Layer M_FLOOD and
M_DISCOVER, but that's all. Everything else will be TCP.
(In my opinion, inside the point to point mesh ACP, one might as well keep a
single TCP connection up for every M_DISCOVER and M_FLOOD, as UDP has no
advantage there)
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
