On 25/05/2017 04:52, Michael Richardson wrote: > Mirja Kühlewind <[email protected]> wrote: > > a TCP connection for the discovery response and require that all other > > messages to be sent over TCP (also removing any option to use any other > > reliable transport because TCP seems to be the right choice here.) > > Some parts of GRASP are really begging for SCTP :-) > I wish it was more clearly an option.... no firewalls in the ACP to screw it > up.
I tend to give the same answer as for UDP (or COAP): let's get the basic spec out and then discuss whether to add GRASP-over-foo specs. If GRASP succeeds, that will be an obvious next step. Brian > > 3) Version and extensibility: section 3.5.4.5: "A possible future > > extension is to allow multiple objectives in rapid mode for greater > > efficiency." How can this extension be defined if there is no version > > mechanism? > > :-) > > Try the new extension and get back M_INVALID if not suppored. > I insisted upon M_INVALID for this reason. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Anima mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima > _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
