Max Pritikin (pritikin) <priti...@cisco.com> wrote:
> (libjwt) didn’t support it. After looking at the code more closely I’m
> not sure a jwt abstraction layer is really even needed; JWS is pretty
> simple to use directly. I’ve forked libjwt and will upload my diff to
> github tomorrow so you can see what i mean.Max, can you indicate what your current thinking is in the movement From PKIX signed custom JSON to ... a) JWS signed custom JSON? b) JWT, with standard claims? -- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
