Max Pritikin (pritikin) <[email protected]> wrote: > (libjwt) didn’t support it. After looking at the code more closely I’m > not sure a jwt abstraction layer is really even needed; JWS is pretty > simple to use directly. I’ve forked libjwt and will upload my diff to > github tomorrow so you can see what i mean.
Max, can you indicate what your current thinking is in the movement From PKIX signed custom JSON to ... a) JWS signed custom JSON? b) JWT, with standard claims? -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
