On Jun 9, 2017, at 22:43, Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > > But if not, *somebody* is going to replicate the packets. If the VRF > doesn't do it, GRASP itself will have to do it. That doesn't seem optimal > to me.
I wonder why you are saying this. Generally, where information needs to be disseminated to a group, there is an end-to-end argument giving the application a big role in that. Supporting this directly in the network can only really be motivated by performance considerations(*); do you think this function here is performance-critical? Grüße, Carsten (*) or where the topology defines the group, but I don’t think this is the case here. _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
