Dear ANIMA community,

Please allow these two questions, which popped up while following recent group 
discussions and I-Ds:

1. Would the group consider an ANIMA-integrated data storage to be relevant in 
the context of the current charter, or, otherwise, does it look like a relevant 
topic for the planned re-chartering?

Background: The idea for an integrated distributed storage in ANIMA could be 
motivated e.g. through network-wide configuration, where data objects would 
become available to all individual nodes and ASAs without relying on any means 
external to ANIMA (like specialized nodes with specialized ASAs, or similar). 
As another example, it seems ANIMA nodes might need to store data in the case 
of e.g. intent distribution, as intents could be conditional and shifted in 
time, like in "Do this, once this and that have materialized" (see e.g. ECA in 
SUPA).

2. In a similar vein, does a publish/subscribe information distribution model, 
built upon an underlying storage, look promising and relevant to the group? Can 
GRASP support that or will it require extensions? The pub/sub is, in our 
opinion, a more general information distribution model than what we saw in the 
current work stream. Yet, before submitting a draft that details such a model, 
we wanted to kindly ask for your opinion on that. 


Kind regards
artur

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to