Fascinating point. I don't know if the IETF has any arguments to claim
anything on any github repository to be IETF work unless it does claim
by itself to be IETF work. I would be surprised if it could.
Given how i just created a pointer to the work, it definitely could not
cause any automatic implication of being IETF work.
Cheers
Toerless
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 12:13:25PM +1200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 04/07/2017 11:52, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> > I am still not good with scatter/gather cloud storage, so i created a stub
> > repository to
> > point to yours:
> >
> > https://github.com/anima-wg/grasp
>
> Th code is not IETF work. It SHOULD NOT be under a repo for the WG.
> I had to move it in a hurry due to a mess made by my university's
> IT "service".
>
> Also, is there or isn't there a WG policy on repos for WG drafts?
> I'm quite willing to join if there is, but there's never been an
> announcement about that and there's nothing about it on
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/anima/about/ under Additional URLs
> If there's a GitHub organization for the WG, it should be listed
> there, I think.
>
> Brian
>
> >
> > Cheers
> > Toerless
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 11:42:07AM +1200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> >> I have moved the current prototype code for GRASP to GitHub.
> >> Please don't use the old URL any more. It will stop working soon.
> >>
> >> https://github.com/becarpenter/graspy
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Brian Carpenter
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Anima mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
> >
--
---
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
