Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But the third locator sent by the Registrar indicates a meaningless
> link-local address, because it could come from many hops away. At first
> I thought this was a confusion with the previous (proxy-to-pledge)
> case, where all addresses must be link-local. But no: this text is just
> confused, I think:This LL address is the Lr from my email of three minutes ago: mcr> Instead, I have two suggestions, not entirely mutually exclusive: mcr> 1) the Registrar says, "I accept IPIP on Address Ar, use Lr for mcr> connections" mcr> 2) we make Lr = well known Link-Local anycast address I included Lr in the protocol, even if we might decide that we want to make it well-known. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
