Hi Brian,
On 7/14/17 12:41 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > That may be true, but for BRSKI as such, the only hard requirement is > an address that is unique on a given link, which is a requirement anyway. > IPIP is more of an issue for the node providing the proxy, which is > hopefully a bit upscale from a light switch. > I made my comment in the context of a possible interface collision in your diagram. Those had to do with the autonomic nodes, not the proxies, as I understand things. To avoid those sorts of collisions, it seems like using the h/w address remains sensible. A collision in those circumstances would be extremely unlikely, whereas relying on poor PRNG almost assures it of happening. These devices are likely to have very little entropy available to them. Eliot
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
