Remember that the pledge can only have a link-local address during bootstrap,
so i would not know how to interpret your comment.

Cheers
    Toerless

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 07:41:40AM +0000, Eliot Lear (elear) wrote:
> Sure. Use normal unicast addresses (ULA or other) if available. 
> 
> Eliot
> 
> > On Jul 17, 2017, at 9:39 AM, Toerless Eckert <t...@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> > 
> > Can you propose a stateless proxy model that would not pass the link-local
> > addresses on to the registrar and that uses Michaels beloved IPinIP encap ?
> > 
> > Alas i have fallen in love with UDP encap because i like to see more
> > networking software now be build like any othrer application on top of
> > UDP/TCP APIs and not mess around with OS kernel features, so all
> > my answers would be "the proxy is an app that either statefully proxies TCP
> > or stateless proxies UDP".
> > 
> > If you want to statelessly proxy TCP and on the registrar use some existing 
> > TCP stack, then i would begrudgingly agree with Michael, that i also need 
> > some
> > kerne level handling of the encap so that i get kernel level TCP.
> > 
> > I am still waiting for some better explanation from Michael about the
> > "Linux kernel and overlapping TCP" to fully understand his proposal.
> > 
> > So, here is one proposal for IPinIP using the current -07 draft ULA 
> > addressing:
> > 
> > A) We assign one of the 8 (3 bit) "T"ype codes to "Subnet Identifier for 
> > Encap".
> > 
> > B) The proxy allocates a separate "Zone" number for every subnet. Zone = 
> > Subnet.
> >    In result it now has for every subnet a separate ULA address for the 
> > IPinIP encap.
> > 
> > C) The registrar announces its ability to support IPinIP BRSKI via GRASP
> > 
> > D) Each ACP device need to use its ACP DeviceID also as the host-part of its
> >    link-local address.
> > 
> > E) The proxy as part of its tunnel functionality also assigns itself the 
> > Registrar
> >    link local address on every subnet. At least logically. Whether it 
> > really needs
> >    to do this physcially is implementation specific.
> > 
> > F) The proxy announces via GRASP BRSKI-IPIP with the Registrar Link-Local 
> > address
> >    (which it can do because according to E) it owns it on its subnets - 
> > GRASP
> >     DULL does not permit third-party announcements, so E) is to make it 
> > legal for
> >     the proxy to announce this in GRASP).
> > 
> > G) Any packets sent by pledges to the Registrar link-local address are 
> > IPinIP
> >    encapsulated using the "Subnet Identifier for Encap" as the source IP 
> > address and
> >    the Registrar ULA as the destination address.
> > 
> > H) The registrar can create a separate IPinIP tunnel per remote proxy, 
> > per-subnet-on-proxy.
> >    It does not need further addresses.
> > 
> > Some more details might be needed, eg:
> > - If a proxy has more than 2^13 interfaces it needs to dynamically allocate
> >   subnet encap addresses.
> > - A proxy might want to map different subnets to differen registrars for 
> > load balancing.
> > 
> > Cheers
> >    Toerless
> > 
> >> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 08:54:46AM +0200, Eliot Lear wrote:
> >> On the other hand, maybe it's fundamental, but is relying on LL in this
> >> architecture to go beyond LL boundaries the right thing to do?
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> On 7/17/17 8:34 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> >>> Toerless Eckert <t...@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> >>>> I thought i had asked that question already but not sure, and not seen
> >>>> an answer: - I have never seen that a device has more than one
> >>>> link-local addr on an interface.  Is this permitted by IPv6 arck ? Can
> >>>> you configure this in eg: Linux. I thought i tried on linux/cisco-ios
> >>>> in the past and i do not quite remember, but i think it failed (only
> >>>> one address).
> >>> 
> >>> dooku-[~](2.3.0) mcr 10879 %sudo ip -6 addr add fe80::1234/64 dev wlan0
> >>> 
> >>> dooku-[~](2.3.0) mcr 10788 %ifconfig wlan0
> >>> wlan0     Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 08:11:96:01:81:e0
> >>>          inet addr:31.133.129.16  Bcast:31.133.143.255  Mask:255.255.240.0
> >>>          inet6 addr: fe80::1234/64 Scope:Link
> >>>          inet6 addr: fe80::a11:96ff:fe01:81e0/64 Scope:Link
> >>>          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
> >>> 
> >>> dooku-[~](2.3.0) mcr 10788 %ip -6 addr ls dev wlan0
> >>> 3: wlan0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 state UP qlen 1000
> >>>    inet6 fe80::1234/64 scope link
> >>>       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> >>>    inet6 fe80::a11:96ff:fe01:81e0/64 scope link
> >>>       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> --
> >>> ]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh 
> >>> networks [
> >>> ]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network 
> >>> architect  [
> >>> ]     m...@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on 
> >>> rails    [
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> --
> >>> Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
> >>> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Anima mailing list
> >>> Anima@ietf.org
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > ---
> > t...@cs.fau.de

-- 
---
t...@cs.fau.de

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to