On 14/08/2017 18:08, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> Only the references. Some are outdated.
> 
> BRSKI to me is not normative. Neither is I-D.ietf-core-yang-cbor.
> 
> ACP may or may be normative. I am not quite clear on the rules:

The rules are not so important for Informational RFCs anyway.
 
> IMHO, prefix-management is not a full solution spec which is why it's also 
> informational.
> rhe spec part of it relates to how to use GRASP, so only GRASP is logically 
> normative to
> me. But you may have better insights ito how the IESG judges this.

No, I think you're right. Seeing no comments from the co-authors, I will push a 
version
with those changes today.

Regards
   Brian

> 
> Cheers
>     Toerless
> 
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 05:11:09PM +1200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> Thanks Toerless. I'm not hearing any disagreement so that will be
>> in the next version. With your WG Chair hat on, are there any other
>> changes required?
>>
>> Regards
>>    Brian
>>
>> On 14/08/2017 16:47, Toerless Eckert wrote:
>>> Reaffirming my preference for 1.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 05:17:21PM +1200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>>> As a reminder, we have two options in the draft for adding support
>>>> of IPv4 prefix management:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Add a version number flag to the objective
>>>> 2. Add a second objective specific to IPv4
>>>>
>>>> So far the preferences I have heard (including my own) are for option 1,
>>>> because it's simpler to implement. I think the authors will go that way 
>>>> for the
>>>> next version, but of course it's a WG choice. Comments please!
>>>>
>>>> Quick link:
>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management-04#section-5.2
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>    Brian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Anima mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Anima mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
> 

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to