Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > On the one hand, you haven't fixed the syntax error that I > pointed out in the flooded objective "AN_proxy".
Oops. I forgot about that part.
Let me Mail_FLOOD some replacement text tomorrow.
> On the other hand, you've changed the discovered objective
> "AN_join_registrar" into a flooded objective. I thought that
> the BRSKI team had decided against that? I don't care,
> either way will work, but I'm a bit surprised.
> The flooded version seems to be correctly defined, unlike
> "AN_proxy".
That's good to know so that I know how to fix AN_proxy.
> (Also, I thought you want to shorten its name to "AN_registrar",
> but that is a detail.)
We have discussed the possibility that not all (EST) registrars would want to
handle join traffic, and so there might be an AN_registrar objective for use
to renew certificates, etc. once the node has joined.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
