On 01/03/2018 11:46, Michael Richardson wrote:
...
> > Even though the BRSKI document is already advanced, we would like to
> > propose to also include CMP as further example for certificate
> > enrollment in BRSKI. This inclusion would make it also easier for other
> > standards or frameworks to consider security bootstrapping based on
> > BRSKI.
>
> I think that it would be very difficult to hack CMP into the BRSKI document
> at this point.
As a matter of principle, it seems better to get BRSKI published as quickly
as possible to meet the WG milestone, and then publish any extensions as
separate documents.
It seems like a good idea to work on such extensions. But one step
at a time :-).
Brian
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
