Hi Alex, Thanks for your comments on draft-carpenter-anima-asa-guidelines.
If I get it correctly you raised the following points: 1. -better describe what ASA are: rather application or network service, and better describe the border between the two and implications for ASA designers/developers in the draft. I think it is an important (and not so simple) topic and worth being discussed. Would welcome views from the group. 1. -NFV is an important area for future networks, and more focus for ANIMA and ASA should be devoted. Agreed; However, I'm not aware that NFV community is following ANIMA work and guidelines on autonomic VNF design/development. Although there are several autonomic/self-* behavior/functionality being developed in NFV. There is clearly a gap here, and a difference in approach. 1. -You mentioned something about the decoupling of self-* functionality (self-configuration, self-healing...) Not sure I get fully what was your comment on this aspect. Could you clarify / develop? Thank you. Best regards, Laurent.
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
