Good support in the WG, no dissenting replies. Authors: Please submit name changed version, and chairs will adopt as working group document.
Thanks, Toerless On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 05:33:03PM +0200, Toerless Eckert wrote: > draft-richardson-anima-ace-constrained-voucher was presented at IETF101 > and received good interest. The authors asked for adoption. As far > as the chairs heard, there was no objection in the room. As new > work, we discussed this with the new AD for ANIMA Ignas Bagdonas and > also concluded that this work would be in scope of our current chater. > > We hereby are officially asking the working group to confirm adoption > of this work: This message starts a two-week adoption call on: > > Title: Constrained Voucher Profile for Bootstrapping Protocols > Name: draft-richardson-anima-ace-constrained-voucher > Authors: M. Richardson, P. van der Stok, P. Kampanakis > URL: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richardson-anima-ace-constrained-voucher/ > > Please express your support or rejection. If you think this document > should _not_ be adopted, please also explicitly indicate the reasons. > > This adoption call will end on May 12, 2018. > > More information as follows: > > This document is intended to become standards track ANIMA WG document > (-03 has a format mistake indicating informational, this would be fixed). > > Standard track is desired because it is meant to become the required > voucher format for solutions with (low-end) devices with existing or > future signaling protocols. > > One of the candidate future signaling to use this voucher is > draft-ietf-ace-coap-est. Another one is BRSKI with DTLS > using the CBOR encoding proposed in the document for use cases > of the FairHair association which includes members from ZigBEE, KNX > and Bacnet. It would also be needed to by other 6tisch > documents such as draft-ietf-6tisch-dtsecurity-zerotouch-join > (from which this voucher draft was actually extracted, similarily to > how voucher was extracted from BRSKI). > > The choice for bringing this to anima was done because of the experience > with the first voucher draft, comparing possible working groups and > concluding that ANIMA was best the best WG for it. > > Regards > ANIMA chairs (Sheng & Toerless) _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
